Michel Onfray La Contrehistoire De La Philosophie Audio 16 Full Best Jun 2026

The search for is not merely a quest for a file. It is a quest for a different way of doing philosophy—one that takes sides, that feels historical pain, and that celebrates the flesh as the only site of meaning.

After you finish Lecture 16, you will never hear the name "Plato" the same way again.

It argues that science is not immune to myth-making and that Freud's work is a case study in how "hidden" ideologies shape understanding of the human mind. 4. Content Structure of the Audio Series

A truncated version (e.g., a 5-minute YouTube excerpt) robs the listener of:

Philosophy began as a spoken dialogue in the public squares of Athens. By delivering his counter-history orally, Onfray strips away the intimidation factor of heavy academic texts. The audio format captures his live energy, spontaneous rhetorical flourishes, and immediate passion, making complex ideas digestible during a commute or daily routine. Uncompromised Intellectual Depth The search for is not merely a quest for a file

To understand the explosive nature of Volume 16, one must revisit the context of its release. The lectures in Volumes 15 and 16 directly inspired Onfray’s 2010 book, (The Twilight of an Idol: The Freudian Fabrication).

This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later.

The central thesis is that these authors provide the most logical and rigorous defense of Christian theology because they refuse to compromise with modernity (democracy, human rights, secularism). Onfray presents them as the "avenging angels" of the metaphysical system he has spent the previous 15 volumes dismantling.

Michel Onfray’s monumental " Contre-Histoire de la Philosophie " (Counter-History of Philosophy) series is a radical rethinking of Western thought, challenging the traditional, often idealistic, canon. While volumes 15 and 16 are uniquely dedicated to a single figure—Sigmund Freud—they are far from a celebration. In , available from Frémeaux & Associés , Onfray continues his critical analysis of psychoanalysis as a "reactionary" philosophy, focusing on the twilight of Freud’s career and his deeper engagement with political and societal issues. It argues that science is not immune to

: Stripping away the "sainthood" of canonical philosophers to reveal their political compromises.

To truly appreciate volume 16, you need to understand the ambitious philosophy project it is part of. The idea for La Contre-Histoire de la Philosophie was born in 2002 when Michel Onfray founded the , a free, open-to-all university in the tradition of the Popular Universities that emerged during the Dreyfus affair in France. Onfray's goal was radical: to democratize philosophy by moving it away from the dogmatic, often idealistic framework taught in traditional academic settings and towards a living, oral, and passionate practice.

Here is an overview of the major arcs found within the 16 volumes:

Onfray’s Contre-histoire flips the script. He excavates the philosophers who were marginalized, ignored, or actively suppressed by the academic and religious establishments. His mission is to construct a "hedonistic" genealogy of thought that celebrates the material world, the body, pleasure, and radical liberty. By delivering his counter-history orally, Onfray strips away

In this 13-CD set, Onfray examines Freud's later life and the ideological structures of psychoanalysis, often echoing themes from his controversial book Le Crépuscule d'un idole

This series is frequently praised for making philosophy accessible and engaging, though Onfray’s provocative style can be polarizing Frémeaux & Associés . It is available on

Michel Onfray est un philosophe français né en 1959 à Rouen. Il est connu pour son éclectisme et son ouverture aux idées non conventionnelles. Onfray a enseigné la philosophie en lycée et en faculté avant de se consacrer à l'écriture. Son œuvre est caractérisée par une critique virulente de la philosophie traditionnelle et de la pensée dominante. Il se définit lui-même comme un "nietzschéen" et un "épicurien", revendiquant une approche de la philosophie centrée sur la vie, la liberté et le plaisir.