The primary reason there is no "LINK Download" for Larry Rivers' "Growing" is that it exists in a legal and ethical purgatory. Legally, the U.S. Supreme Court has never provided a clear-cut definition of obscenity. Under the Miller Test, it is difficult to classify a piece of fine art as obscene if it has "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value".
Due to the age of the documentary, finding it requires seeking out specialized archives or art film distributors. Here are some ways to look for "Growing":
The documentary showcases his studio life, his interactions with peers, and his commentary on the evolution of his style.
The official estate manages the licensing and archival requests for his work. --- Documentary Growing 1981 Larry Rivers LINK Download
Larry Rivers was a towering, complex figure in 20th-century art. The 1981 documentary "Growing" remains an essential visual document, offering a glimpse into the mind of a creator who refused to be confined to a single style.
Documentaries and video art pieces from this specific period in Rivers' career often focused on:
His iconic works, such as Washington Crossing the Delaware , reimagined historical tropes with a fresh, sometimes irreverent perspective. The primary reason there is no "LINK Download"
The film's director, Peter Rosen, opens the documentary by showing Rivers in a provocative and often unflattering light, including scenes of his sexual provocation and drug use. It forces the audience to confront the question of whether an artist's work can or should be separated from the artist's actions. In this sense, "Growing" has become the central test case for this question within the legacy of Larry Rivers.
The question of whether constitutes child pornography is not merely rhetorical. Under the Miller test established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Miller v. California (1973), material is considered obscene if: (a) the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work appeals to the prurient interest; (b) the work depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and (c) the work lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
The Larry Rivers Foundation retained custody of the material but agreed to keep it strictly sealed and restricted from public viewing, scholarly access, or commercial distribution. Why You Cannot Download This Film Under the Miller Test, it is difficult to
: Contemporary art historians, legal experts, and the public broadly view the film as a gross abuse of parental power and a violation of a child's right to privacy. The consensus treats the work as an illicit recording of minors rather than protected intellectual property. Why There is No "LINK Download" Available
By 1981, video technology had become more accessible, allowing artists to document their lives, studios, and social circles with unprecedented intimacy. Film and video projects associated with Larry Rivers during this era typically blended autobiography, artistic philosophy, and candid observations of his contemporary peers.
Decoding the Cultural Context: Larry Rivers and the 1981 Documentary "Growing"
: In 2010, NYU returned the specific films to the Larry Rivers Foundation to ensure they were not made part of a public scholarly archive, citing the need to respect the privacy and requests of the family members depicted. Availability and Access